"MEP" Whistleblower and the Use of Sub Par Interpreters in Afghanistan

Amazing that in this day and age of global, culturalfor. This does not make MEP guilty in my mind, as I
and linguistic awareness, that a company would bebelieve that everyone is "innocent until proven guilty",
willing to send unqualified linguist into a battle zone,but this does raise some alarming red flags in my
but that is exactly what is being alleged. In an articleopinion. How did MEP achieve such high success when
released on September 8, 2010 by ABC News, theythe Army's previous providers achieved only 43%
document and detail the claims of a former employeesuccess rate? A few percentage points and I could
of Mission Essential Personnel (MEP) who claims thatbuy it, but 54% percent higher success rate then
documents and scores have been falsified in order toprevious suppliers? That just does not sound right in
meet their governmental contract demands.my opinion. I understand that MEP's interpreters
As a Language Service Provider (LSP) we often heartranslators can earn up to $210,000 per year which is
about the errors and wrongdoings of interpreters orvery attractive and I am sure adds to the
of those who claim to be an "interpreter" orrecruitment of linguists, but did MEP cut corners to
"translator" but have no formal training or knowledgeachieve such staggering results? What training was
of our industry. It happens every day in our countryprovided by MEP for their linguists? How were the
but when the U.S. sends a "professional linguist" totests and evaluations conducted? Without knowing
Afghanistan, I can only imagine how stressfulMEP's internal control mechanisms and quality control,
interpreting in those settings can be. I find it hard toI can't fathom such a high success rate of qualified
believe that a company would willingly put profitscandidates.
before lives, especially a company that is primarilyIt is interesting that MEP signed a $492.4 million dollar
focused within the linguistics industry. The goal forcontract with the Army Intelligence and Security
most business is to provide a profit to theirCommand on August 18, 2010. I would have to
shareholders, but ethics and morals play a vital role asassume that the Army Intelligence and Security
well, and did MEP were protocols overlooked in orderCommand is pleased with their previous work or a
to turn a profit?new contract would not have been issued, but I do
In July, the CEO of MEP testified before awonder how these allegations will affect MEP.
congressional committee that MEP was "able toThis will be a story to follow closely, but if these
achieve a 97 percent fill rate of the government'sallegations against MEP are true, then how many lives
requirement for linguists. Previous contractors neverhave been lost and what will the consequences be
exceeded 43 percent." Now from the perspective offor MEP's management team? If the allegations are
a Language Service Provider based in Chicago butfalse, how much damage has been done to MEP's
providing services nationwide, I can attest that thereputation and how do they respond and repair their
Afghan languages such as Dari and Pashto are oftenorganization? It's a tough situation and it will be
difficult to locate qualified interpreters and translatorsinteresting to see how it plays out.